View profile

The Edge of Digital Ethics - A Facebook Issue

Per Axbom
Per Axbom
As many readers will be aware, I do not have a Facebook account. I go so far as blocking its related urls on my computer. And I do also try to avoid spending time unnecessarily talking about Facebook. Regretfully it continues to be that overarching shadow that will take another decade or two to shake off my back. I’m currently helping a person evade ongoing abuse empowered by Facebook as well as other technology.
Today it’s hard to send something out without recognizing the hubbub Facebook has caused the past weeks and the better part of this year. I’ll just get this out of my system for now and sprinkle this issue with examples of the demons that appear to always be hanging on the tail of this beast.
Before I leave you to it, I do have some quick things to say about the senate subcomittee hearings that took place yesterday following recent Wall Street Journal reporting.
The witness for this hearing was Antigone Davis, Global Head of Safety at Facebook for the past seven years. You can read her opening statement (PDF). The hearing was very much focused on Instagram and the wellbeing of youths and children.
Davis made point of pushing this point of action:
From June to August of this year, we removed over 600,000 accounts on Instagram alone that were unable to meet our minimum age requirement.
As expected, the responses to questions were evasive and indeterminate, over and over bringing attention to how Facebook do not allow children under 13 on any platform. And yet… 600,000 accounts were recently removed on Instagram alone. A key indicator of a significant number of underage accounts. The real follow-up questions I would have expected here are of course how often accounts are removed, what percentage of underage accounts this actually represents, and for how long each account exists before being removed.
There were also clear efforts from Davis to downplay the economic motivation behind recruiting more tweens and teens to their platforms, which the members clearly refused to buy into. These members were having none of it, and I have to say it’s fascinating to see this type of bipartisan consensus.
In general I think the questions from committee members are getting better over the years (previous hearings have had their cringeworthy moments). I especially appreciate the attention that is being brought to the symbiosis of mental health and controversial digital design choices that we know so much more about today than just five years ago. This OECD report, for example, outlines how mental health is often aligned with the abusive interaction with others – today enabled and exacerbated by online tools.
It is clear that there will be important regulatory steps taken in the United States over the next year or so to safeguard children on, and from, harmful online platforms. This is especially related to modernizing the 1998 Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), with the addition of the Kids Internet Design and Safety Act (KIDS).
How the effects of these changes will propagate to other communities of burdened individuals, and to the rest of the world, remains to be seen.
On Tuesday, October 5, the hearings will continue with testimony from the most recent Facebook whistleblower.
Be good and take care,

Antigone Davis deflects a question on collecting children's information.
Antigone Davis deflects a question on collecting children's information.
The Facebook Files
Facebook Employees Flag Drug Cartels and Human Traffickers. The Company’s Response Is Weak, Documents Show.
Facebook could face hefty fine in Russia over banned content, says regulator
She exposed how Facebook enabled global political manipulation. Now she's telling her story.
Why Facebook is using Ray-Ban to stake a claim on our faces
Facebook's WhatsApp Fined for Breaking E.U. Data Privacy Law
Big Tech tops EU lobbying spending, study finds
The Silent Partner Cleaning Up Facebook for $500 Million a Year
Understanding why people give so much away
Our evolved intuitions about privacy aren’t made for this era
In recognition of Stanislav Petrov
Digital Compassion: A Human Act
Listen 🎧
Deep Dive - Digital Governance — on the Surfacing Podcast
Mindful reading
Why are hyperlinks blue? | The Mozilla Blog
How a simple email address makes things complicated
A word of advice
Good news! You can finally stop people from sharing files with you by blocking them in Google Drive. I bet you're not even slightly surprised that this turned out to be something abusive ex-partners use to harass survivors.
Buy a coffee for Per ☕️
Nya utökningen av FRA-lagen möttes av gäspningar
Turerna kring Skolplattformen tar aldrig slut. Till dess att jag blir klar med del 2 av mina granskningar kring Stockholms stads hantering av it-projektet kan du ta del av dessa nyheter.
Stockholms stad tvärvänder – ska betala för alternativa appen - DN.SE
Slarv och slöseri kring Stockholms skolplattform | SvD Ledare
Hur ligger vi till – en samlad analys av den offentliga förvaltningens digitalisering 2020 | DIGG
Per Axbom
Läser om kovändningen gällande @oppnaskolplatt (som inte alls är i hamn ännu, eftersom förvaltningen förvanskat koden igen för att störa ut den populära appen). Fastnar i citat av @IsabelSmedberg: ”Vi har lagt ner alldeles för mycket resurser i [Skolplattformen] redan.”

Did you enjoy this issue? Yes No
Per Axbom
Per Axbom @axbom

A newsletter about responsible innovation and universal wellbeing in a world of runaway machines with fuzzy accountability.

In order to unsubscribe, click here.
If you were forwarded this newsletter and you like it, you can subscribe here.
Created with Revue by Twitter.
Axbom Innovation AB, Regnstigen 8, SE-169 60 Solna